An evidence of lawlessness and justice terror

I received mail from the European Court for Human Rights (ECHR). To my surprise I did not find any answer to my request for monitoring but just an application form with the explanations for filling it out. The cover letter contained just a reference number on my name to be used in the application form. As I know that the ECHR deals only with cases, when all “domestic remedies have been exhausted” I called the court to get an explanation. After I explained my situation and the content of my letter to ECHR the lady on the phone confirmed that an application from me would have no chance. The ECHR had preferred to act as if it had not understand my request for monitoring instead of replying to it. It seems that Akhmed Chatayev, whose alleged terror act had annihilated 44 human lives, had more luck than the East European sex-slaves and me, because he was persecuted by the “bad” Russian authorities, while the sex-slaves suffer at the hands of the “good” German and other Western authorities and I am persecuted by the “good” German justice. Apparently “political correctness” is more important for the ECHR than human rights.

Anyway, I had found out that there will be no court to rectify the legal violations of the Leipzig District Court in my case. And there is no way for me to overestimate the danger from faked acts with regard to the submitted by me papers – not only because of their unreliable processing and maintenance but also because last January I was told that the hearing would take place in April 2016 and after I asked for confirmation for the receipt of my papers, the hearing was put off for a period “not before August/September 2016” (prosecutor Renger pushed for a hearing in September 2015). Under these circumstances I published in my German language blog sexsklaverei.blogspot.com all acts from my case relating to its matter – I could not figure out a better way to expose the violations and justice terror in my case. I noted that if someone finds the acts too absurd to be true, he or she should keep in mind Article 353 d N 3 of the German Penalty Code, providing for a punishment up to one year in prison for making public the acts of a trial before its completion. Theoretically a convicted can publish them after the end of the trial but do you think that practically he can do it? I stress again that the German lawmakers have set up ideal conditions for the German magistrates to apply recklessly justice terror against the dissidents. In my case this Article should not be applicable as this trial should have been stopped due to the many legal violations in the investigation phase. However, the magistrates would apply it for their own security.

The published acts are as of September 13, 2016 – the day of my last visit to the Leipzig District Court.

Of course, before publishing I have deleted the personal data and the contact details of the involved private persons. An exception is the mobile phone number of “Lili” - it is published anyway as part of her SMS to me and I wanted the readers to see the proof that the SMS was sent from her mobile.

I noted that the absence of many pages is due to the fact that lots of acts – including my first three articles and the protocols from the interrogations of the Hungarians are available in more than one and in some cases in three exemplars. Apparently the investigators wanted to create the impression that they have conducted a real investigation and not a fake one.

I asked the readers to review my briefs from July 27, 2016 and my defense statement (the former is an exact copy of what is now in the acts while the latter is a copy of what I submitted with a stamp of acceptance only on the first page – after that the pages will be only numbered) and to find anything on them, which is a guarantee that they are a fixed part of the case acts. I myself did not see any.

I have asked the readers to question themselves, if the acts, I have submitted to the court, a taken away, do they have a chance to find out what my defense was all about. I advised them to look for comments to my statements of the judge and of the prosecutor or for eventual follow-up activities. I have not seen any. The judge has acted as if my statements  did not exist.

I explained in brief my defense strategy. Its core is that in view of the many violations in the investigation phase, mainly because no investigation against human trade was conducted and the investigation against me was done by the same police officials I have accused in my blog, the trial should be stopped. The few statements, because of which I am accused, have been made in connection with human trade and they can be discussed only after an investigation for human trade has been conducted and there is a conclusion, whether  human trade had taken place in Leipzig. I made some comments to these statements in connection with misunderstandings but I explicitly did not touch upon their matter.

I also published my complaint from December 22, 2011, my fax to the ECHR and the cover letter from ECHR.

Thus I provided my readers with a documented insight into a trial with a predetermined outcome, in which the accusations a completely based on lies, part of them already proven by the defendant, the other part very easy to be proved provided there is a compliance with the law, in which seemingly the only issue for the judge is how nevertheless to sentence the defendant and thus force him to delete his blog without giving ground for accusations of justice perversion.     

No matter of my destiny the published case acts will remain as an evidence for lawlessness and justice terror, conducted in support of human trade and of the Organized Crime by the law-enforcement and justice authorities of the criminal dictatorship, known as “the state of law” Federal Republic of Germany.