What is the
difference between a diplomat and a woman?
If a diplomat
says “Yes” he means “Maybe”,
If he says
“Maybe”, he means “No”
If he says
“No”, he is not a diplomat at all.
If a woman
says “No” she means “Maybe”
If she says
“Maybe” she means “Yes”
If she says
“Yes”, she is not a real woman.
(A Bulgarian
joke from the 80s)
The German
Parliament (Der Bundestag) is on the way to pass a law, publicly known as “No
means No”, under which a sexual act is a rape even if the perpetrator has not
committed violence or threatened with its use – an expression with words or
with gestures of a disagreement to the sexual act suffices to qualify the
sexual act as a rape. The concern of the slavery state of Germany for
the free women seems very peculiar if one compares this concern to the
brutality of this state against the East European sex-slaves. On the one side
we see how the victims of the modern slavery under the supervision of the state
authorities are not only regularly raped but forced to risk their health and
lives and do absolutely everything so that the slaveholders can pull out the
maximal gains from them. On the other side we see the lawmakers who have set up
the most suitable legal basis for the slavery, going to the other extreme by
accepting such a law. In this article I will explain this vast contradiction.
As a rule a
man and a woman get into a sexual intercourse in the absence of other people,
i.e. of potential witnesses and if no violence has been used the issue of the
proofs becomes vital. While I do not know how a rape, when the victim just has
said that she does not want the intercourse or expressed it with gestures (I do
not have even an idea of the possible gestures for such a case), can be proved
but I know that rape by all standards is a heavy crime and the accused under
all circumstances will have to undergo real ordeals like custody with all
consequences of it and with lots of restrictions which in reality will destroy
his life even if it never comes to a sentence. I can not imagine how an adult
woman who really does not want to have an intercourse with a man will just say
“no” and do nothing if he continues but I know that definitely this law will
open the door for many women who have had voluntarily sex with a man to accuse him
of rape for reasons like financial gain or revenge in cases of infidelity or
breach of relationship.
“No means No”
is not designed to help real victims of rape but further to increase the
dependence of the men from the women and represents the next step in the so
called “empowerment of women”. Proclaimed as strengthening of the rights of the
victims (who are of course women) it actually represents a privilege because it
is totally at the cost of the rights and actually of the freedom of men. This
is not simply an implementation of the ancient and vicious principle “Divide
and conquer” but represents a suppression of the historically more active part
of mankind.
Like any
component of the empowerment of women and alongside with the upbringing to
egoism by the young generation under the form of “children rights” “No means
No” will lead to a further destruction of the family in our modern society.
Less and less young men nowadays go for a relationship with a woman. The
reasons are not only the possibility of being accused of sexual harassment,
rape or by eventual separation to lose the contacts with the own children –
which is the standard case in Germany but mainly the growing power
consciousness of the women and use of their power. Young women today as a rule
demand more and more from their partners offer themselves however less and less
– I have noticed this in Canada as well as in Germany.
The
destruction of the family is one of the major factors behind the declining
birth rates which in many developed countries, where empowerment of women is
taking place, lead to demographic catastrophes..
The
destruction of the family fosters prostitution and actually the modern slavery,
which dominates this industry – what other alternative is left for a straight
man who has chosen not to go through the growing troubles related to a
relationship but use the services of prostitutes, more and more of which are
sex-slaves?
The
destruction of the family deprives the young generations of a main traditional
source of upbringing and social experience, which is independent from
governments and provides the youth with the first truly human relationships. It
leaves the children only with the school system, which is controlled by the
rulers and where the children more and more are getting brainwashed and less
and less educated.
“No means No”
is a step in the trend of turning under the slogan of protection of human
rights of more and more actions, previously regulated by tradition, social
culture and experience into crimes. The worst is not that more and more
activities are declared punishable but that the new punishable activities are
of such a nature, that almost everybody can be accused of having committed
them, and this is a sign for a pending mass terror. For now we see that only
single and inconvenient for the rulers persons are prosecuted for this kind of
activities – let me mention just Eliot Spitzer and Dominique Stross-Kahn but
the legal preconditions for a mass terror are already available and it is just
a matter of time.
Unfortunately
do the decline of the population, the destruction of freedom and the rise of
the modern slavery belong to the main goals of the Western rulers, in
particular of the US rulers. “Empowerment of women” is an American brand
exported to the dependent from US (in this case) Germany with American social
technologies – first an event is set up (the New Year night at the railway
station in Cologne) to trigger an hysteria, then the mass media push this
hysteria to the extreme thus putting pressure on the lawmakers to pass the
respective laws so that years later they can justify what they did with respect
to the public opinion. By the way, up to now no media or government body has
explained, what exactly happened in the New Year night in Cologne.
While this
blog explains why the Western rulers want the modern slavery to thrive –
because they are the main beneficiaries of it and only a fool can believe that
those in power want to give more freedom and rights to those, over whom they
rule, the interest of the rulers in the decline of the world population needs
explanation.
The now late
filmmaker and political activist Aaron Russo told in 2006 in an interview the
radio moderator Alex Jones about his conversations with Nicholas Rockefeller,
one of the most powerful man on earth. The latter had revealed to him the end
goal of the elite – full control over everybody and over the whole society
(including with implanted chips) and control over the whole world. Rockefeller
has reportedly complained that the world population was too big to be
controlled (besides, the earth resources are limited) and mentioned a reduction
by some 50% would be necessary. USA and the West have led many wars in the last
decades in which millions of people have died but to achieve such a reduction
through a military conflict, it has to be nuclear without guarantee for anyone
for survival. Therefore, the elites use a number of additional means to achieve
their aim like the deliberate destruction of the family, mainly through
empowerment of women; the sex slavery, which is a quiet genocide for the
nations in Eastern Europe; the promotion of homosexuality (gay pride) etc. The common
between all these steps is that they lead to
reduction of the population. Another common feature between empowerment of women
and the promotion of homosexuality is that they are not about rights
but about privileges – in the last decades all supported by the elite rights
boiled down to the creation of privileges for certain social groups at the cost
of the rights and freedoms of other much bigger social groups.
The planned by
the elite full control over the society is a mild expression for a planned
total slavery. The contemporary modern slavery of the East European sex-slaves
and the trade with human organs is just the beginning.
I would like
to cite a Bulgarian scientist – the professor in sociology Duhomir Minev, who,
in one of his articles, after citing the famous phrase of John Maynard Kaynes
“The mad people who rule over us” added that the rulers nowadays are not simply
mad but their distorted, inhuman and insane rationality makes them not only
cruel, merciless and capable of any crime but drives them to turn the exercise
of power into a chain of permanent crimes. He writes that today the exercise of
power is a secret, organised and criminal activity. This blog is an excellent
proof that Prof. Minev is right. By the way, he has conducted social studies on
the prostitution and knows what he is talking about.
Some three
months ago, my country fellow and ex-colleague Mrs Irina Bokova proudly
mentioned during the hearings for the position of Secretary General of the UNO
that she comes from a small but proud country. However, according to the
Australian Walk Free Foundation (annual report for 2014) this small and proud
country – Bulgaria, is the country with the biggest percentage of enslaved
population in Europe. And while the same organisation claims that the number of
slaves in Europe amount between 400 000 and 1 million – almost all young women
in their fertile age, and the number of slaves throughout the world is
estimated to some 30 Million, Mrs. Bokova did not mention the problem of
slavery but instead stated that if entrusted with the high position she would
promote empowerment of women. Mrs. Bokova is an experienced and intelligent
person and she knows very well what the most powerful people want to hear from
her.
