The modern slavery in Denmark

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

The modern slavery in Switzerland

I will start my narrative on the slavery in Switzerland with a big lie, which can be read in the report of the government of the canton of Bern to the Big Council of the canton in connection with the Prostitution Law, which in view of the admission that Switzerland has been “touched” by human trade says: “The main problem is that the authorities lack information on the environment of the prostitutes. This hampers the effective protection of the persons exercising prostitution”.

I have already written in this blog that back in 2010 I contacted the Swiss federal police Fedpol 4 times – twice on the phone and twice in written form (on paper and by e-mail through the Swiss consulate in Berlin), whereby I published the first page of my e-mail in my German language blog sexsklaverei.blogspot.com. In both conversations the Fedpol officials, after hearing that I want to report on a big Hungarian organization switched over the conversation to my identity and personality – they knew very well the organization as well as that they had to “neutralize” anyone” who tries to make problems to it. I do not think that the officials who take phone reports are very high-ranking and this means that any operative from Fedpol with responsibilities on human trade knows this organization and protects it. In my case Fedpol avoided any contacts with me and did not want my information – not only that they knew everything about it but policemen do not contact, particularly formally, persons who have to be eliminated. I contacted also Eva Danzel from FIZ. I have no doubts that she submitted my information to the competent authorities but I doubt that she interrupted her contacts with me on her own will and decision. The Swiss authorities, as well as the authorities of the other developed Western “democracies” know everything about human trade on their territories.

In my case it is even more important that despite my request for confidentiality and particularly not to submit my information to the German authorities, Fedpol did exactly this and only 3-4 hours after the conversation the German federal police BKA started its deceit with the correspondence with the non-existing Fedpol official Beat Humbel. For comparison the intermediary, through whom I established the contact with BKA wanted first to talk to Dietmar Schmidt – he knew very well that the heavily involved in the slavery BKA might order my killing, which would be a problem for his police, with which I already had had official contact. Fedpol knew also very well what BKA could do with me and nevertheless the Swiss police submitted my information and contact details to BKA for the purpose of my “neutralization”. I have already accused BKA of planning and preparing my murder but Fedpol is fully involved in these crimes.

Most important, however, is the fact that three years later the Hungarian slaveholder organization undisturbed and unpunished continues and successfully further develops its presence and activities in Switzerland. The author of the lie – the government of the canton Bern is located in the same city as Fedpol, which knows everything about the slavery in the country. Besides, the Bern government opposes the compulsory registration of the prostitutes – clear evidence that it does not even want to know (at least formally) anything about prostitutes. On top of all the Swiss police are authorized to enter brothels but they use this authorization to ask about residence grounds and never ask about the situation of the women. Sex slaves in Switzerland are exploited, beaten and held imprisoned in licensed brothels. Licensing of brothels bears no requirements for the situation and treatment of the prostitutes. The Swiss authorities do not want to see the undisputable marks of the slavery like the constant transportation of the victims between brothels and towns and the fact that in many brothels work women from the same nationality, obviously delivered by the same pimp.

The big lie at the beginning of this article reveals the hypocrisy of the Swiss state, the authorities of which take part in the modern slavery exactly like the German authorities. The rest of this article will confirm this allegation.  

As already written I contacted Fedpol to inform this police on the criminal activity of the Hungarian organization. I had found out 39 (!) brothels in Switzerland with known to me Hungarian women from Leipzig. And my list of brothels could not be full – my French is weak and my Italian – non-existent.

Switzerland is the most intensive consumer of sex slaves from Eastern Europe. I am sure that the ratio of victims per 1 000 inhabitants for this country is the highest. The explanation is in the attractiveness of the Swiss market in view of its high prices as result of the higher living standard, the strong governmental support for the slavery, the proximity to the countries of origin of the slaves and the vicinity of the biggest slave market of Europe – Germany. In the internet I have also seen many women from other central slaveholder organizations from Eastern Europe.

I see no reasons to believe that slaves in this country are treated differently than in Leipzig. With regard to exploitation one of the Hungarians “working” mainly in Switzerland told me that “they were paid something”. From another one I know that in Switzerland, like in Leipzig, they are not allowed to go out of the brothels, which says very much about their situation there. Many of the brothels are used for work-in of the new slaves – most of the girls I came to know were new in the trade and without doubt any of the regular visits of the pimp brings them lots of brutality and punishments. It seems that for the sex slaves the licensed Swiss brothels do not make any difference from the non-licensed German brothels. As written above brothel licensing is not related to the treatment of the women. Mrs. Winkler from FIZ, who supports victims from the brothels in Zurich, tells stories about forced prostitution, about forced collection of all earnings, about deprivation of the right to turn down a client and coercion to certain sexual practices.

Still, I noted one difference to Leipzig. In the work-in centers with Hungarians there are no Swiss and free women, which means that the slaves are not mistreated in the presence of such women like in Leipzig – sure sign that at least the free women are less dependent in Switzerland than in Germany. Also there seems to be more sensitivity to public opinion as instead of criminal methods like in Leipzig the Swiss authorities use the licensing to let their people run the brothels and the slavery in the country. As a whole the Swiss human traders are more precautious than the Germans – already in 2010 they gave their victims different nationalities in the advertisements, particularly from countries not supplying slaves like Sweden and Norway. Also the long working time of the slaves is not announced – it is understood from the announced work time of the brothels.

I have already written that release from taxation is a key pre-requisite for the exploitation of the sex slaves and Switzerland confirms this rule. Legally self-employed foreign prostitutes are not subject to taxation in Switzerland while Swiss and foreign salaried prostitutes are tax liable. All the sex slaves in the country are “self-employed” foreign women. As the money from the central slaveholder organizations goes to the federal decision makers the local decision makers make up with their own imports of slaves. As real estate is very expensive in Switzerland they place the slaves mainly on the streets where the population can note the dependence of the women as well as their exploitation. How do the authorities react to the resulting tension? Very indicative are the statements of the head of the Economic and Labor Office of the canton Zurich Mr. Bruno Zauter, made during a press conference on July 8, 2010. According to him the polemic on the pressures on prostitutes is created by the press and human trade and forced prostitution are not acute problems in the canton of Zurich. His argument was that during the contacts “the women seemed to be in good mood” and did not leave an impression that “the pressure on them was too strong”. Should I wonder after such statements that 7 brothels out of the above mentioned 39 brothels are in the canton of Zurich? Basically Mr. Zauter said the same the slaveholder from Leipzig Jens Kottke wrote in my German blog and what Dietmar Schmidt said to me during our second meeting. All slaveholders claim that there victims are fine and happy with their lives. By the way, it were the statements of Mr. Zauter which prompted Mrs. Winkler to tell the truth about the situation in the Zurich brothels.

In that press conference Mr. Zauter admitted that his canton does not comply with the federal instructions to consider the working in the brothels women as employed and to issue work permits for them in order to tax them and added that these instructions are not followed also by the cantons Bern and Geneva. He justified this massive non-compliance with the impracticality of the instructions and assured that the federal authorities are aware of the problem and do not insist on compliance. I believe that in reality the federal instructions are very practical but very inconvenient for the slavery. How can you exploit sex slaves if they have to pay taxes and how can you do whatever you want with them if they are registered and have work permit? We see that in the “state of law” Switzerland, as in the “state of law” Germany, the laws and regulations representing impediments for the slavery (most probably passed before the introduction of the slavery) simply are regularly violated by the authorities.

In order to stress the representative nature of Mr. Sauter’s statements I will note that twice – in 2010 for street prostitution and in 2012 for saloon prostitution the parliament of the Zurich canton voted against the compulsory registration of the prostitutes and thus opened broadly the door for the slavery. Exactly like in Germany the human traders in the canton of Zurich can do with their victims whatever they want as the latter can easily disappear without traces. Same is the situation in the cantons of Geneva and Bern and not by chance in the first one is located the biggest work-in center for the Hungarian sex slaves. I can name only one canton in Switzerland, in which the registration of the prostitutes is compulsory – Freiburg.

The statements of Mr. Sauter reveal part of the reasons why the slaveholders force the slaves to move from brothel to brothel – these movements are used to excuse the lack of any registration and taxation of the victims which are the main pre-requisite for their exploitation and mistreatments. The permanent mobility is one of the major marks of the modern sex slavery and the other reasons behind it are to prevent the establishment of relations of the victims with their clients, to better utilize the brothel facilities and thus increase the profits for the brothel owners and not to let the clients note the total exploitation of the women.

Switzerland is considered as a state of law and one of the most developed democracies in the world but we see that this is simply another slaveholder state where the sociopathic decision makers have created all the necessary legal and administrative pre-requisites for the slavery and where human suppression, organized crime and brutality simply are better masked by the façade of democracy.        

Germany: “The Rule of Law” and the Modern Slavery

Any slavery exists for the purpose of the full exploitation of the enslaved people. Its main function is to give the opportunity to coerce the slaves to do everything against their own will for the sake of their full exploitation. Any slaveholder state creates the legal framework, allowing the coercion and exploitation of the slaves. As the contemporary slaveholder states are masked as “democracies” and “rules of law” they can do whatever they want only with people who formally/legally do not reside on their territories and do not exist there by documents. Now I will reveal how the laws and regulations of Germany make this possible for the vast number of sex slaves in this country i.e. now will reveal the contribution of the German lawmakers to the modern slavery.

At first glance Germany has good laws on prostitution and human trade. The penalty code forbids and punishes pimping, forced prostitution and exploitation of prostitutes. But in 2002 in expectation of the sex slaves from Eastern Europe the German Parliament passed a new prostitution law, which gave the brothel owners the rights to give instructions to the working in their establishments self-employed women. In its interpretation of the law the Constitutional Court ruled out that the brothel owners are allowed to determine the working time, the location of work and the prices of the women. Thus the Court allowed the brothel owners to do what Article 181a Pimping (2) defines as crime and punishes it. Besides, there are no formal requirements to the brothel owners in Germany – neither licenses nor criminal record certificates. Legally anyone can become there brothel owner, in reality – only those who are allowed to. I will explain what I mean with one example from Leipzig. Several years ago a new brothel was established in this town and was almost immediately vandalized. The whole Leipzig believes that the German boss of the Hungarian sex slaves Jens Kottke stands behind the vandalizing (I wrote on this to the federal police) but up to now the perpetrator is unknown. The result of this selection of brothel owners by the criminal regime in Germany is well described by the head of the criminal police in Augsburg Mr. Klaus Bayerl who wrote in his report “The situation of the prostitutes in the international human trade” that almost all brothel owners in Germany are criminals with close ties to the Organized Crime. It turns out that the German state has given the industry along with the working in it women to the Organized Crime.

The selection of the brothel owners and the actual limitation of the access to this business has another important consequence – the exploitation of the prostitutes. For flats, which would carry total costs (rent plus utilities overhead) of about 400 euro monthly, Kottke collects 85 euro daily, which makes up 2550 euro on a monthly basis.

It might sound strange but taxation and the related to it accountability are the major impediments to the exploitation of the prostitutes. If the woman is a salaried employee, her salary must comply with the accepted standards. If the woman is self-employed she has to report her revenue and her costs, which however in this case would be an evidence for a robbery of 2550 euro monthly, which is explicitly forbidden by the penalty code not to talk about the sex slaves, which in the best case end up with some 15% of their revenues. This problem – the necessity to hide the exploitation of the prostitutes, was solved by the German lawmakers already in the 60-ies, when to my mind the German rulers decided to get hold of the money from this trade. The Duesseldorf method introduces a flat-rate daily tax payment, completely independent from the revenues of the prostitutes and varying from province to province – from 5 to 15 euro. From various sources I can conclude that the monthly revenue of a prostitute in Germany is in the range between 5 000 and 8 000 euro. If we take the average flat-rate of 10 euro daily (300 euro monthly) and a revenue of 6 000 euro, we will arrive at a tax rate of only 5%. Thus the Duesseldorf method not only allows hiding revenues and thus the exploitation of the prostitutes but diverts significant funds from the state budget to the decision makers, controlling the prostitution.        

But there is more to it. The responsibility for the declaration and the payment of the taxes of the prostitutes lies not with the women but with the brothel owners. They collect the money from the women and pay in the local finance offices. While they always collect the money they do not always pay the taxes. When I mentioned to the BKA officials that Kottke might be held liable for tax evasion, they started laughing and urged me to prove this.

As you see the German lawmakers have done their best to hide the exploitation of the prostitutes in Germany. Locally they often even went further. Leipzig is one of the two towns in Germany in which street prostitution is illegal. The authorities explain their decision with public moral. This, however, is not true as the municipality papers, delivered by almost each door in town contain lots of advertisements of semi- and fully naked women from the flats of Jens Kottke. The authorities have made street prostitution illegal to force the women to exploitation in the flats of Jens Kottke and few other brothel owners, appointed by these same authorities. Another proof of this is the fact all attempts of Leipzig prostitutes to use flats on their own ended up with vandalizing of the flats and with unknown perpetrators. Again the whole town talks that this was Kottke and again prosecution and police do not know anything about this.

Although the law of 2002 recognized prostitution as a normal trade i.e. as not different from the others, prostitution remains the only legal trade in Germany, for each neither registration nor license is required. This is the formal justification why the brothel owners pay the taxes of the prostitutes.

Now I come to my major point in this article. Those of you, who have read up to now carefully, must have noticed that the procedures do not require any formal relationship between a prostitute and a state – no documents, no records, nothing. There is nothing which can prove that a woman from Hungary or Bulgaria has been let’s say in Leipzig, in one of the flats of Kottke in the period between this and that date. This is the situation, which allows the human traders to do with their victims anything they want, which is the main purpose of the German legislation and regulations. A person who is registered who pays taxes can not disappear traceless and without problems for the perpetrators but a person whose presence can’t be evidenced, can. This is also the explanation why none of the sex slaves in Germany has health insurance, which is required by law from all foreigners residing in the country and despite the fact that prostitution is risky for their health as often they are forced to provide services without condom. Sex slaves are not a party in the rent of the flats – their pimps and actual warders pay the rent to the German brothel owner from the money they have collected from their victims. The advertising pictures are not considered legally valid evidences – the BKA officials told me that these pictures are no proves that the girls on them actually have been in the brothel who advertised them. Also therefore they laughed when I mentioned tax evasion for Kottke – no presence of any of his victims in his flats can be proved.   

We see that the political class in Germany not only gave the sex industry to the Organised Crime in the country and removed all impediments for the exploitation of the prostitutes but has set up the preconditions for the full “freedom” of the criminals in the treatment of the vast number of sex slaves from Eastern Europe. Some of the consequences of this criminal “freedom” I have already described in this blog. It is because of this “freedom” that my Hungarian friend Lili with 29 years of age had to take heart drops and could not stand to be touched by the head as result of the many hard blows she had received there from her pimp.

Quite logically I did not get any response to my letter from November 21, 2010 to the Chancellor Angela Merkel and the five party fractions represented in the German parliament, in which I described the inhuman situation of the Hungarians and appealed to them to stop the brutality.

The absence of taxation and tax reporting, of any real requirements for registration and licensing are the undisputable marks of the modern sex slavery, which we shall trace not only in Germany but in other slaveholder states. The formal laws have no meaning by such realities as they are violated anyway by the decision makers. By the way, the best environment for slavery is created exactly by restrictive laws as they allow to leave the whole trade and crime for the decision makers.

The real rule of law and the modern slavery are incompatible but in Germany they seem to co-exist only because instead of rule of law there is controlled by the decision makers legal arbitrariness and criminal despotism. Rule of law in Germany exists only in the official propaganda. The much advertised good laws are neutralized by other contradicting them laws and regulations or by the “interpretations” of the competent courts

In view of the obvious inadequacy of the prostitution law already for several years there has been much talk and work on a new law but this is all simulation of activity. The main beneficiary of the slavery – the political class, will never ban slavery on its own will. If they want to do it, they know perfectly well what needs to be done. Already in ancient times the Greek statesman Solon found a comprehensive solution for the control of the prostitution, uniting the society’s interests with the human treatment of the prostitutes, the majority of whom were slaves. Even to introduce registration, licensing and taxation with the respective accountability (like for any other trade) would suffice to depart at least from the brutal slavery, described in this blog. And the existence of incompatible with the rule of law supported by the politicians and authorities Organised Crime is another vital proof for the absence of the much propagated German rule of law.

The swamp of the German state criminality

This article deals with the scandal, which broke out in May 2007 in the German province Saxony, after the appearance of press reports on an investigation conducted by the provincial counterespionage about the connections of high ranking politicians and justice officials to the Organised Crime (OC) in the province and which became known by the public as the “Sachsensumpf” (Saxon Swamp) scandal.

It is an unforgivable negligence to write about human trade in Leipzig and about its support by the authorities and the despotism of the prosecution without bringing the topic in connection with the above mentioned scandal, which would be also a very good continuation of my narrative on the Leipzig prosecution. First of all I would like to stress, that all circumstances presented below are 100% based on press reports. Therefore nothing in this article should be interpreted as incrimination of any of the mentioned below persons. This blog is about the modern slavery as the biggest crime of the German and the other Western states and each personal role is to be considered within the framework of the criminal state systems.

Undisputable in the Saxony scandal are the committed crimes and law breaches and the fact that up to now with just one partial exception their perpetrators remain unrevealed or unpunished. For practical considerations I will call here the persons, named in the investigation report “The Untouchables” as unlike their investigators they never came to experience real troubles or career destruction - even some of them got further promoted. I find the press marking as corruption scandal inadequate and misleading – the scandal is about more serious crimes and therefore I will call it “Saxon Affair” or “The Files Affair”.

The Crimes

According to the member of the competent parliamentary commission Andre Hahn the counterespionage Dossier deals with abuse of office and bribery, perversion of justice, betrayal of secrets, Obstruction of justice in the Official, sex and drugs related crimes, real estate speculations and bodily harm up to death.

Meant here are two murders in Leipzig in the 90-ies – of a court secretary for real estate (her corpse was found 4 years later in another province) and of a real estate agent, who intended to testify to the police; of the criminal police chief in Plauen and of a Russian who must have belonged to his network. Only those few who have seen the files know the actual number of murders committed and the scope of crimes perpetrated. Three assassination attempts are known, one of them against a female confidant of the counterespionage who took part in the surveillance. Other undisputable crimes are child prostitution, coercion of children to prostitution, threats to journalists, confidants and investigators and mutilations of journalists.

The counterespionage investigation was concentrated around two criminal activities – real estate speculations and human trade, especially with women and children. There is a close connection between real estate speculations and human trade for the purpose of sexual exploitation and prostitution at all in Germany – the only legal form of exploitation of the victims is the rent for premises, which has nothing to do with the ongoing market rent rates for real estate properties and besides, gives the brothel owners the first earned money of their victims.

The press reports allow drawing the conclusion, that the real estate speculations have brought damages to the municipality of Leipzig in an amount of approximately 1 billion euro – sufficient amount to “justify” the above murders.

The investigation has documented numerous visits of Czech girls under the management of their pimps to the City Hall of Leipzig, where the juvenile sex slaves entertained the top city officials of the town. It makes also clear that all imported sex slaves were in Leipzig with the knowledge and at the order of the authorities.

The points of departure – the case “Klockzin” and the child brothel “Jasmin”

Martin Klockzin was in the 90-ies the legal manager of LWB, the Leipzig community real estate company, which at that time had about 120 000 flats on its balance out of which about 40% were subject to restitution. He introduced the policy to protest the claims of the former owners. These claims were brought to the Office for open ownership issues, where their consideration was prolonged until the owners gave up and sold their property at about half the ongoing market price so that after the renovation the new owners could sell for big profits. In October 1994 however, there was an assassination attempt against Klockzin, which he survived despite the three bullets received. Three of the four small criminals received life sentences and the shooter got 12 years.

The chief of the police commissariat 26 for Organised Crime (OC) in Leipzig Georg Wehling noticed however, that the investigation had not sought the real instigators of the crime, although two names had come up in the proceedings. He interrogated the offenders who mentioned to him two businessmen from Aellgau as instigators. With the assistance of one of the criminals he collected proofs against the two and they received a fine of DEM 2500 each for instigation to dangerous body damage – the crime for which the small criminals had received life sentences.

The reason for the crime turned out to be a dispute for a living house on Riemannstrasse 52. The two businessmen had a purchase contract for that house with its owners for DEM 680 000, while a lawyer acquired the property only for DEM 350 000 with help from the LWB through the law for encouragement of the investments. The lawyer has committed herself to build social flats for Millions DEM, which she never did. The businessmen managed first to stop the deal through a court but the Provincial Court let it through – the lawyer was the common law partner of the vice president of this court Juergen Niemeyer, who with that deal acquired two flats for himself. The same lawyer presented Klockzin in the process against his offenders.

The criminals informed Wehling that Klockzin was a regular client in the children brothel “Jasmin”. The two businessmen had threatened several times that they were aware of involvements of Klockzin and top magistrates in child prostitution and could talk publicly about this, which could be the explanation for their extremely mild sentences. Wehling interrogated some of the girls from the brothel and they pointed out at Klockzin, Niemeyer and the two businessmen. Wehling found out that during the investigation on the brothel nobody asked about the clients of the child prostitutes, which might be the explanation for another extremely mild sentence – that of the brothel owner, given by judge Niemeyer.   

With his investigation Wehling must have touched very important interests (he investigated another children brothel with East European children in the age between 8 and 12 years) which why the career of the most successful investigator in Saxony up to 2002 went downhill. His commissariat was broken up, he personally was smeared, suspended, had to undergo 9(!) preliminary proceedings, 8 of them were cancelled and in 1 he was found innocent. Currently he is not allowed to work within the OC area and to deal with confidantes so the Untouchables and the organized crime in Leipzig can’t be bothered by him anymore.

Wehling must have submitted his findings to the only structure in Saxony, which still dared to investigate against the OC – the desk “OC” of the provincial counterespionage and obviously thus began the surveillance of high-ranking officials and magistrates, which produced the famous dossier of 15 600 pages, having provoked the scandal.

The Government Offensive

Already in 2005 the Saxon Constitutional Court limited the scope of the investigation to the cases, which could jeopardize the democratic basic order of the country – as if the crimes of high ranking officials and magistrates and the threats to journalists and investigators do not constitute a danger for the democratic basic order. The Saxony Data Protection Officer Andreas Schuerig accused the provincial counterespionage in October 2006 of constitutional violations. He even suggested shredding the files. Already in May 2006 the desk “OC” was broken up – exactly like the Commissariat 26 in Leipzig 4 years earlier and for the same reasons. Despite the liquidation of the last structure watching and investigating the OC, its associates continued their activities and this necessitated for the government their quick removal. .

The scandal was instigated by the most loyal governmental troops – the prosecutors. According to the OC desk head Mrs. Simone Henneck (now Skroch) her office submitted the files to the prosecution and the latter, instead of treating them with confidentiality, passed some of them to the press. All published names belong to people, who at the time of the press releases were already inactive. The moment of the leakages coincides with the first deliveries of Hungarian sex slaves to Leipzig against which the presence of low-abiding officials in the town was highly unwanted.

The Saxon government head Georg Milbrandt ahead of any investigations declared that there was no corruption and OC in Saxony and accused the OC desk head Mrs. Henneck of “having magnified the processes with blind passion for hunting and blooming fantasy”. This proven wrong statement was a clear declaration of war against the low-abiding officials and a clear instruction to his subordinates how to behave in the crisis. His minister of Justice Geerth Mackenroth supported his boss by stating that there was no “swamp” in Saxony and thus made clear to the prosecutors and the public how any investigations of the Saxony Affair should end up.   

After the president of the Saxon counterespionage was removed from his position he had to undergo 4 preliminary proceedings and the OC desk head Mrs. Henneck underwent 5 such proceedings.

The government reached its goal – the removal of the low-abiding officials in favour of the organised crime. Since 1994 no member of the OC in Saxony has been tried or sentenced.

However, the government failed to win the propaganda war. All its lies – about the illegal nature of the investigation, about the incompetence of the counterespionage on OC issues and on the unreliability of the gathered by the investigators information fell publicly apart. After 3 years all proceedings against the ex-President Mr. Stock have been closed down due to his proven innocence. This means that the counterespionage has worked in full compliance with the law and professionally. Mr. Stock himself stressed that the OC desk had worked under his close control and he has no critical remarks for its work on the investigation. It is proven that the OC desk had not one but several informers in the City Hall. And most important – two of the former sex slaves in the brothel Jasmin recognized the judge Niemeyer who gave the mild sentence to their pimp (4 years instead of the foreseen by the penalty code 10 – 12 years), and the former chief prosecutor Norbert Roeger as their former clients. The prosecutors have accused them for slender and brought them to court but could not break the courage and the human dignity of the two women who want the process against them to continue so that their innocence is recognized.

The truth is breaking through although according to Mrs. Henneck some important files have been destroyed by the next President of the counterespionage Olaf Vahrenhold.

Very impressive in this scandal is the despotism of the German Justice as already evidenced in the Klockzin case, where for the same crime some got life sentences, others – a fine of DEM 2500 only. This despotism is very well generalized by one of the victims of the murder attempts - Mr. Peter Koeberle in his letter to the Justice Minister Geerth Mackenroth: “The corruption and the legal injustice committed each day against countless citizens are becoming unbearable”. Mr. Koeberle has seen his shooter and up to now, more than 17 years after the attempt, he has been denied the opportunity to testify and the shooter remains at large.

The government did not shun any brutality to support the OC in the province. On July 3, 2007, when Mrs. Henneck collapsed physically and was lying motionless in a carrying, the new leadership of the counterespionage barred the access of the emergency medical workers to her and tried to intimidate her with preliminary proceedings in order to get from her concession for betrayal of secrecy. Two of the investigative journalists have been kidnapped, tortured and mutilated. In their cases the actions of the OC and of the prosecution complimented each other as hammer and anvil. After their mutilation by the OC the prosecutors accused them of numerous crimes, including for self-inflicting their disability for the purpose of getting the respective social benefits. In Saxony now take place 25 preliminary proceedings against 12 journalists who have written against the OC. One journalist is prosecuted for slender after he submitted his information to the provincial criminal police (LKA) and the institution “lost” it.   

Conclusions and lessons

There is a very meaningful detail in the Files Affair in Saxony – the press reports reveal that all Untouchables and their political protectors are West Germans, who have come to the eastern province of Saxony to run it. Thus the Saxon Affair reveals the full dependence and control of the new provinces (from the former East Germany) by the West Germans and the old Bonner Establishment. The Affair shows how under the slogan of introducing democracy and rule of law the Western invaders literally robbed Leipzig and introduced despotism instead of democracy and Organised Crime (OC) instead of rule of law – Organised Crime was unknown and non-existing in the former East Germany. The Files Affair reveals the brutal imposition of the OC in a new province and suppression of the last resistance against the criminalization of the country by the West German establishment. The fact that the Western provinces and the federal government sent “independent” experts who despite the facts and the unrevealed crimes confirmed the lies of the Saxon government leaves no doubt that the main decision makers in Germany not only support the Untouchables and the committed crimes but are at the bottom of the crimes in the Saxon Affair and are their main beneficiaries. Thus the Affair disproves the lie that Saxony is more criminal than the other provinces, particularly the old ones. The only difference between Saxony and these provinces is that in Saxony there has been resistance by some officials, mainly from the apparatus of the former East Germany to the criminalization of the province, while in the West the process of criminalization is completed and no resistance is even thinkable. It turns out that the Saxon swamp is just an areal of the big German swamp.

The Files Affair reveals the full support Organised Crime in Germany enjoys from the state up to its impunity and its role as informal governmental body for the conduct of illegal activities for the purpose of enrichment of politicians and top decision makers.

The Saxon Affair shows the quiet criminal terror, to which the German rulers through the OC and the Justice subdue the German population. The Affair refutes the myths for freedom of the press and rule of law in contemporary Germany. It turns out that they exist only in the propaganda but not in real life.

The Saxon Affair confirms my personal narrative in this blog and reveals astonishing parallels to my own experience. If you follow the comments to my German language blog sexsklaverei.blogspot.com made by the human traders you will see how, exactly like the Saxon investigators, I was first smeared in any possible way and then the prosecutors started their investigation against me. And exactly like with the German journalist they tried to destroy my major evidence and then to sue me for slender, only in my case they did not “lose” it but stole it, and finally did not succeed.  

Most important, the Files Affair confirms my major point – that the modern slavery is the product not simply of organized crime but of the involvement of the modern states, mainly those in Western Europe and North America.

The Saxon Affair points out at the actual developments in whole Eastern Europe, where under the same slogans of introduction of democracy, market economies and rule of law, the West, not directly like in Leipzig, but indirectly, through fully controlled local establishments, ruined and robbed the countries in the region and imposed powerful organized crime for the enslavement of the many East European women which nowadays are mistreated and exploited, just like the Hungarians in Leipzig, throughout the brothels of the West.

The statistics of the modern slavery

Last year the International Labor Organization (ILO) has published its second assessment report on the scope of the forced labor in the world for the purpose of economic and sexual exploitation. I find the data very informative and impressive and now I will present it and discuss it here.

For better interpretation of the numbers I would like first to come with some explanations. In the absence of reliable national statistics (only 4 countries in the world have national statistics!) the methodology of the ILO is based on “reported cases”, which inevitably makes the numbers conservative. The main criterion for forced labor is the impossibility of the victims to decline it. The questionnaire used is specifically targeted to minimize the probability for untrue signals. Although the ILO has the national data, only regional data has been published. The only reasonable explanation is political pressure on the side of influential governments. With regional data each government can say the problems do not concern its country. And more important – it is not under pressure to undertake something against forced labor.

According to the assessment nowadays there are about 20.9 millions victims of forced labor i.e. true slaves in the world. 10% of them are exploited in the public sector and 90% - in the private one. 22% of the victims (4.5 millions) are subject to sexual exploitation, which is the number of the forced prostitutes i.e. of the sex slaves in the world.

The number of the world victims of forced labor is really big but the worst is that it is the result of an increase of 70% of the same figure from the first assessment in 2005 – for seven years only!  Back at that time the number of the victims was 12.3 millions.

Worst is the situation in the region compounding the Southeast European countries Albania, Bosnia, Serbia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Turkey and the former Soviet republics. With 4.2 victims per 1 000 inhabitants this region has surpassed Africa, which has 4 victims per 1 000 inhabitants. Best is the situation in the region of the developed economies and of the European Union, where there is “only” 1.5 victim per 1 000 inhabitants. The authors believe that the low rate is due to the well-established control mechanisms. I do dispute however the praised performance of this region and here I will deal more in detail with the figures related to it.

First of all, this is a region in which with exception of the USA slavery has been unknown for centuries.

Second, this is the region with the biggest growth of the slavery. In 2005 the number of the slaves was 553 000, while in 2012 it was already 1.5 millions, which makes up an increase of 171% for only 7 years! I claim that the actual increase is much higher, because as evident from this blog we have in this region really the best control mechanisms, unfortunately not for the slavery but for the slaves and there is no way for the victims from the centralized organizations like the Hungarian one to generate “reported cases”. Developed countries seem to mean well developed, organized and covered slavery.

Now I would like to go over to an important issue – the nationality of the victims in the region.

From this blog we have learned that the German authorities, while actively participating in the slavery of the East European women, pursue the enslavement of German women. This is confirmed by the official statistics (of BKA!) according to which half of the few saved victims are German women. This is not because many Germans are victims of forced prostitution but because the authorities barely pursue the forced prostitution among foreign women. The same is true about the women from the other developed economies.

On the other hand, the number of foreign women from non-EU countries has dropped significantly since the East European countries have become members of the EU. Facing an abundance of women, obviously well exceeding the market demand, the authorities gave preference to the women they can better control and exploit. The authorities use the push of the redundant women as propaganda of their efforts against sex slavery – like the case with the women from Nigeria is. Today with the exception of the foreign women who are permanent residents of Germany almost all visiting prostitutes and hence sex slaves are from Eastern Europe.   

Due to the developed stage of the economies in the region the use of slave labor for economic purposes is insignificant. The need for slave labor for US agriculture is satisfied from South America. From the 553 000 slaves in the region in 2005 only 94 000 were exploited for economic purposes.

Now I will try to estimate the number of the slavery victims from the new EU members. Due to lack of information and in the awareness, that it is not true, I assume that the percentage of the victims in all countries of the region is the same - 1.5 victims per 1 000 inhabitants. The population of the new EU members – also of the countries of origination of the slavery is 97.7 millions. This gives a number of the victims inside their own countries of 146 600.

The population of the old EU members, which are countries of destination or to put it bluntly, the big slave markets, is some 403.4 millions. For these countries I assume the percentage of the East European slaves to be 90%, which makes up 1.35 victims per 1 000 inhabitants or 544 600.  We get a number of the slaves from the new EU members within the EU of 691 200! The EU is the biggest sex slave market in the world today. If its members had the same co-operation within the other areas like in the human trade the EU would be flourishing today, seriously.

In North America we have a population of 311.5 million in the USA and 34.1 million in Canada. For these countries I assume the percentage of the victims from the new EU members to be only 20% - 0.3 victims per 1 000 inhabitants which gives 103 680 additional East European victims in these countries.

For Australia (22.3 millions) I assign a percentage of only 10% - 0.15 victims per 1000 inhabitants or 3350 victims.

For Israel (7.6 millions) I assign 50%, which makes 5720 victims.

I give 90% to Switzerland (7.8 millions) and Norway (4.7 million) to get a number of the victims there of 16 875.

My calculations give an overall number of the slaves from the new EU members exploited in the region of the developed economies and the EU of 833 575.  I do not count the slaves from these countries in other regions like the Middle East. I know that there are Bulgarian sex slaves in Jamaica, I am sure that there are not only Bulgarian slaves there and that there are slaves from our countries in all resort destinations, controlled by the Americans but since I have no figures, I discount them totally. I do not count the victims – both for sexual exploitation and for their organs, in Kosovo.   

833 575 out of a total population of 97.7 million makes up more than 8.5 victims per 1 000 inhabitants. In reality these are 10 victims per 1 000 inhabitants or one victim per 100 inhabitants! If we account for the aging structure of the population in the new EU members, we will get not more than 10 – 15 women in their fertile age out of these 100 inhabitants and at least 90% of our victims are young women. This means roughly that even based on conservative statistics one out of 10 young women from the new EU member states is a slavery victim! This means, however, a quiet genocide for the population of the new EU members. And whoever doubts the figures here should look at the latest US report on human trade, where the total number of the slaves in the world is much higher - 27 millions. The main source of the information – CIA, knows best of all about human trade.

Clear sign for the ongoing genocide is the fact that while the old EU member states consider how to circumvent the EU rules to stem the migration from the new member states, the EU and the slavery state Germany actively pursue the non-visa regime with Russia – as result of the genocide the new members are already short of young female slaves and the human traders are actively looking for new sources of slaves.

The ILO statistics enables to discover the true ugly nature of the processes going on in Eastern Europe disguised as “democratization”, “transit to market economy”, “European unification” and “freedom of movement”. The “transit to market economy” turned into robbery and poverty, the “European unification” – to neocolonialism, the “democratization” and “freedom of movement” – to human trade and actual slavery.

 

The unlawful appearance of the German prosecution

The principle of mandatory prosecution commits the German prosecution to investigate all complaints on criminal activities. Besides, the European Court for Human Rights commits all signatory states (Germany and Switzerland are among them) to follow and investigate any suspicion of human trafficking. When such complaints are submitted to the police, the police body is obliged to submit them to the prosecution, which is the sole authority to decide on such complaints. In my case BKA clearly violated this rule and did not submit my information to the prosecution.

Having noticed that the German authorities did not react on my blog and that the situation of the Hungarians did not change, on December 22, 2011 I sent my complaints for criminal activities against the Hungarian women and me to the Chief Prosecutor of Germany and to the Prosecution of the province of Saxony. I needed them both as BKA as a federal body is within the competence of the Chief Prosecutor. The reason I approached not the prosecution in Leipzig (all actions in Saxony took place in this city) but the superior Prosecution of Saxony is that by stopping the investigation against me but not starting any investigation against Jens Kottke this prosecution had clearly violated the law and its duties – if I had not slandered I was right in my allegations about him and the situation of the Hungarians. My complaint foresees all related to the happenings delinquencies and is against the Hungarian pimp, Jens Kottke, Dietmar Schmidt, his partner, their superiors, the high positioned person, related to BKA, who asked and obtained my deprivation of my fixed monthly payment from the insurer, federal chancellor Angela Merkel and strangers. I asked the prosecutors to investigate whether the above persons have committed or participated in the range of delinquencies specified in the pages 180a Exploitation of prostitutes, 181a Pimping and 232 Human Trade for the purpose of sexual exploitation of the German penalty code. With regard to Angela Merkel I asked on opinion whether she committed obstruction of justice by not reacting on my letter to her from November 21, 2010.

In order to avoid a general answer like the one I got from BKA – that there are no evidences for criminal activity I requested answers to some specific questions. I asked whether Jens Kottke and the furniture trader are police agents, whether the Hungarian pimp has registered his business in Germany as he is obliged to do and whether he has ever filed tax returns and paid taxes. I asked whether BKA officials are allowed to conduct informal meetings – without protocols etc. with people making complaints and whether they may cheat such people as they did with me with the fake Beat Humbel. I asked for an investigation on whether BKA and Fedpol plotted my assassination before finding out that I had approached a third country police representative. I put the question whether BKA has the practice to tape the phone conversations and the meetings with informants, how long they keep the records and whether my conversations with BKA are available. I asked the prosecutors to track the phone conversations of Jens Kottke for the periods November 18 – 21, 2009 and January 11 – 17, 2011, of the furniture trader for the period June 20 – 27, 2010 and of Dietmar Schmidt for the period April 12 2010 – June 2 2010. I asked for the testimonies of Lili on February 7, 2011 and for Kottke’s complaint against me. I requested information on whether an investigation is still going on against me. I asked whether Kottke’s name was mentioned in the investigative report of the Saxony counter-intelligence for corruption and connections between prostitution and important public figures and magistrates, in what connection and whether any investigation was conducted.

I requested the German prosecution to approach the prosecutions of Hungary, Switzerland, USA and Bulgaria on the issues of their competences. The last contact was necessary as a Bulgarian woman had made a complaint to the police in Blagoevgrad (Bulgaria) for being forced into prostitution and held and exploited in one of the flats of Jens Kottke against her will.

Since the only response, I got, was a letter from the Saxony prosecution saying that the case had been transferred to the Leipzig prosecution I used a private trip to Leipzig in the summer of 2012 to visit the Leipzig prosecution and find out what the status of my complaint was.

On July 23 I visited the Leipzig prosecution and got a visitor’s pass for room 217, where, judging by the table on the door, was the archive of Department VIII. I guess this was the place where accused citizens were made familiar with the accusations against them. After a while I was told by one administrator that I would be received in the nearby room 2007, where I had already noticed some activities. I went to the door and found out that this was the office of the head of Department VIII and Ph.D. in Law Mr. Lieber.

He received me politely and advised that “actually” there was an investigation going on against me. As proof of this he showed to me from a distance a folder, where I could only see a file number, which I wrote down. I asked about the accusations against me and my host replied that “some people did not consider what I had written at the beginning of my blog sexsklaverei.blogspot.com to be true”. Since writing something,  which some people find untrue does not constitute a criminal offence itself I asked for more explanations but did not get them. I asked for my accusers and heard BKA and than after some prolonged hesitation the name of Jens Kottke. This was the only information I could obtain from Mr. Lieber on the complaint against me. Although he had justified the delay with my reception (I had waited about 30 minutes) with the necessity to become familiar with my file, nothing in his performance revealed that he really new something about my investigation. When I suggested that the prosecutor working on my file should join us to help Mr. Lieber replied that this prosecutor was on vacation.  When I asked about the name – I had more than two weeks to stay in Leipzig, he did not say anything. His lack of knowledge did not prevent him from inviting me to give testimony – the microphone was on the table and he was ready to begin however I declined. I do not know whether asking an accused to testify without having presented to him the accusations is legal but I am sure it is not ethical.

Article 136 of the German Criminal Procedure says that the accused should be made familiar with the accusations against him during the first meeting so that he is given the chance to repel them. If a prosecutor so outright violates this article, there must be a good reason for this. The main reason for this violation is that the Criminal Procedure entitles me to demand collection of evidences in my defence and this is the last thing the prosecution would like - in my case there are plenty of evidences just to mention the SMS of Lili. However, as long as I do not know the accusations I can not ask for anything specifically.

My failure as accuser turned out to be even bigger as the one I suffered as accused. Mr. Lieber denied knowing anything about my complaint. This was strange because both investigations – the one against me and the one I had initiated had to consider the rightness of my allegations.

I asked Mr. Lieber to comment the 16 and 24 hours workdays of the Hungarian women but he behaved as if he had not heard me.On my question on the legality on the side of BKA to conduct informal meetings with informants he replied with the typical for him modesty that he could not comment this.

Realising that the purpose of the meeting was to deprive me of any relevant information I expressed my understanding that officials have to follow the instructions of their superiors and left. At the exit I asked the staff to check in the system for the investigation on my complaint, they checked and told me that it had been stopped.

In my German blog I published my visitor’s pass as evidence for my visit to the prosecution and for the fact that I was directed to room 217, however never entered it, i.e. I was denied the information I was entitled to get by law.

Two days later I visited again the prosecution in connection with my other complaint – for the theft of my mobile phone. It was also stopped but I got the setting decision, on the back of which I asked whether the suspect was a police informant. However when I asked also for the setting decision on my complaint for human trafficking I was denied it. I asked for the reason and I was told that the prosecutor in charge had decided so. This outright violation of the law  - a prosecution is obliged to provide setting decision to the accuser when the investigation is stopped, has also its good reason. The setting decision allows the accuser to bring and contest this decision to a higher authority and if he is a sufferer he is even entitled to a judicial review of his complaint. By not giving me the setting decision the Leipzig prosecution denied me any access to justice on the issue.

The Chief Prosecutor of Germany never bothered to reply my complaint.

When human trafficking is concerned there are no laws in Germany.

Upon my return to Canada I published an article describing my experience with the Leipzig prosecution and having decided to give them a second chance to comply with the law (they seemed to be surprised with my visit) I asked them to send me the information and the setting decision I had requested before.

As expected, they did not react and I have drawn the conclusion, which I present here, that the Leipzig prosecution violated the laws to deny me access to justice in order to protect the organized crime, the slavery, the brutality and crimes against the East European women.

The appearance of the prosecution justifies the threats made by Jens Kottke and his followers in their comments after my first article in the blog sexsklaverei.blogspot.com with my punishment from the “state of law” – obviously the German “state of law” is designed to protect organized crimes and its crimes, including human slavery, and to prosecute the opponents to these crimes.

The modern sex slavery

For describing the mechanism of the modern sex slavery I will also use the report of the head of the criminal police in Augsburg Mr. Klaus Bayerl “Die Situation der Prostituierten im Internationalen Menschenhandel” (“The situation of the prostitutes in the international human trade”), which can be found in the Internet. This is the only objective writing on the topic I have met written by a professional with human capacity.

I will concentrate my attention on the big central organizations. Not only because I know them better on the example of the Hungarian one but mainly because these organizations are the backbone of the modern slavery – the state machines for exploitation and suppression were set up because of them and through them and all new trends in the sex slavery go through them and for many reasons, also because of the high competition the treatment of the women in these organizations predetermines the treatment of the other dependent prostitutes. Besides, the western press does never write about them – like the law-enforcement bodies deals with small pimps presenting them as the main culprits of the modern slavery.

In the previous articles I explained that such organizations are controlled by the colonial power of Eastern Europe – the United States of America with the local American dogs as operative managers and perhaps junior partners. The first function of the slavery is the enslavement of the women. Mr. Bayerl points out in his report that the recruiters of the organization targeted young women from poor families or with limited or none social contacts/support. Clearly no such woman can reject “proposals” of the organized crime, when it is backed by the state. So lack of social support i.e. helplessness, appearance and age are the major criteria for the selection of the victims and not the willingness for prostitution. The personal acquaintance is necessary just to make sure that the prerequisites are available. Bearing in mind the enormous exploitation the modern sex slavery is based solely on forced prostitution – no woman would work voluntarily under such terms anyway. The central human trafficking organizations have to guarantee their foreign partners that nobody in the countries of origin will effectively step in to defend their women and that they can be treated as commodities.

For the exploitation of the women are set up criminal joint ventures, whereby the Eastern part is responsible for the delivery of the human commodity and its “processing”, while the Western part takes care of the market and of the control over that commodity. These joint ventures predetermine that the women have to give up minimum twice as much of their earnings than the independent women, as they have to satisfy the full financial demands of two pimping organizations - hence the heavy norms and the minimum 16-hours workdays. Mr. Bayerl writes (back in 2008) that the initial “training” of the women was conducted in the country of origin before sending them abroad. In Leipzig we see from the client

reports that the training takes place abroad as all local state bodies support the organization anyway. At this stage they are forced unconditionally to obey the orders of their boss, to provide all kinds of services the clients want until the norms are fulfilled. They typically experience all available punishments. They do not get a leave unless they have not fulfilled the norms for all the days they have worked. The main lesson they learn from their start is that there is no other way for them but to comply.

There are clear rules in the use of violence against the women in the modern sex slavery: first, only the pimp beats, not anyone else; second, violence is exercised only in the absence of outsiders (the violence to the Hungarians in front of

German women was definitely a mistake, made because of the full support of the state and town authorities, presuming that no one can undertake anything against anyway); third, no traces from the violence must stay and if still available, the victim should be released from work so that no client can evidence the traces from violence. In Leipzig the women are beaten mainly early in the morning so they can recover until the active visit time at 10-11 am comes. The pimp is nothing more than a supervisor who dispatches the women to their workplaces (they change them regularly) and does the dirty work for his bosses making sure that the women deliver, otherwise he has to pay from his own funds and by not less than thousand women this is not possible. Anyone in his position will do absolutely the same so the cruelty of the sex slavery is not so much in the nature of the pimps but in the business model, according to which large fixed amounts have to reach their destinations

The profitability of the sex slavery is enormous. Provided that a young woman, healthy and not drug addict is traded in Germany on the average for EUR 5000, the Hungarian organization does not pay more than 2000 – 3 000 for each woman. With the 50 EUR daily lease the investment is paid off within two – three months. And still they use the women until they can fulfill the norms and be competitive.

While lots is written about the East European human traders very little is know about their partners – the brothel owners in the West. Mr. Bayerl highlights also this issue. Thanks to the booming human trade these people enjoy an abundant supply of women and pick them up from the catalogues of the human trafficking organization according to market demand. They prefer to work with sex slaves because with them unlike with the independent women the occupancy is full and the payment of the rent is guaranteed by the pimps, who lease the flats and rooms from the owners and sublease them to their women. The sex industry is highly profitable when sex slaves are used. Mr. Bayerl describes the brothel owners as predominantly criminals with contacts to the organized crime. They work in close cooperation with their Eastern partners, often encourage and demand punishments for the women and demand guarantees for the behavior of the women. Their typical requirements for 7-day workweeks and for diversified services by the women very often generate violence. The German laws have no formal requirements to the brothel owners and they do not need any licenses.

Control over the prostitutes and the information they give to clients is a very important function of the human traders. Mr. Bayerl writes that in the brothels the women are subject to a very tight control system including video cameras, security personnel etc. They are not allowed to phone, may leave the brothel only with permission and are not allowed to have clothes on during worktime. He dwells on the use of the clients’ chat-forums as a tool for control over the women and we have seen that in Leipzig we have seen that this tool has very often led to punishment of the women. Nowadays police authorities are also very instrumental in the control over the women. The Hungarian women in Leipzig believe that their phones are tapped – they must have found out how in a number of cases some of them have come to punishment. Further argument for the validness of this claim is the fact that they are not allowed access to the Internet – a control makes sense only when it is tight and if the women could talk freely over the phones why should they not have access to Internet? The Hungarian police is tapping their Hungarian phones, and the German – their German phones. The last three days before the second dinner I have been away from Leipzig. The day before or same day around lunch time I called Lili to make sure that a dinner with me would be still convenient for her and her friend, she confirmed and it is this call which led to the disruption of our dinner. Lili had worked almost 4 years for the organization and knew not to talk. If she talked at all, also our first dinner would have become known. The result of the whole system of control is what the German woman had told me; “They know everything about their women.” Other important result is that the women do not speak out about their situation in front of their clients – the probability of being caught is big and the punishments are cruel and most important, nobody can help them anyway as their bosses are backed by the state machine anyway. Therefore when I started asking Lili questions about her situation she told me that I think too much – clear expression of the hopelessness of her situation.

By the current deep involvement of the European states in the human trade the sex slaves from the central organizations are sent only to destinations, where the official support is guaranteed. Therefore their availability in certain country or town is a clear sign that the authorities are involved.

The modern slavery is correctly associated with the ancient slavery, however, not all parallels hold true. The major differences come from the fact that the ancient slavery was legal while the modern one is illegal. First, keeping the situation secret requires more restrictions and punishments for the victims. Second, when every body might buy slaves their prices were higher which forced the owners to take care of the human commodities, which is not the case now. If Kerry had been expensive, her boss would not force her to risk her life for additional EUR 30. Third, the above the law powerful slave holders today have much more slaves than the ancient ones which further deteriorates the treatment of the victims. Besides, in view of the development of the medicine part of the slaves become inevitably victims of the industry of death – the human organs trade. Lastly, the legality of slavery presupposed clear rules for enslavement in the past – like non-payment of taxes, while the current illegality leaves only one rule – the vulnerability of the victims, which in Eastern Europe is valid for more than 80% of the population.

The situation of the victims of human trade will further deteriorate. First, poverty is further growing in Eastern Europe and for more women prostitution is the only way to make a living. Second, demand in Western Europe is dropping in view of the crises. The sex industry will grow only in an intensive way i.e. through the offer of more services. The American porno industry shows us that these additional services are in direction brutality. The American industry is the advertising network of the sex slavery. Many of the services shown there can be performed only under threats and violence and more and more actresses are sex slaves like many of the Hungarian women who while waiting for a shooting work between 16 and 24 hours for their bosses. What is shown by the industry today will be demanded in the brothels tomorrow.

Up to now I have revealed the true role of the European states in the human trade. A look at the official side and figures will confirm my findings. According to BKA statistics in 2007 in Germany only 689 women have been helped out of human trade and 714 suspects have been detained in this connection – less than a woman per suspected pimp. According to press figures the number of dependent women in Germany is around 360 000. In Switzerland in the years 2004, 2005, 2006 for human trade have been convicted respectively 2, 11 and 5 persons. That means that according even to official figures the authorities in both countries are doing almost nothing against human trade and in addition they concentrate on small pimps, probably making some problems to the large organizations, which as we see are untouchable and enjoy the support of the same authorities.

Now I come with some words on the official contribution of the German politicians and lawmakers. In 2002 the German parliament passed a new prostitution law, which according to Mr. Bayerl strengthened the legal positions of the brothel owners, allowing them to give instructions to the prostitutes and weakened the legal positions of the prostitutes. Of course the lawmakers did not address the issue of excluding people with criminal background from the industry thus leaving hundreds of thousands of women in the hands mainly of criminals. Legally prostitutes in Germany are not obliged to work in brothels. With the exception of two cities (Leipzig is one of them) they can work on streets or simply hire flats in which to work (under certain preconditions of course). In reality Jens Kottke vandalized such flats while the police did not move in, thus silently supporting him. I was told this by the German woman and one of the comments in my German blog confirms this situation. Thus any German woman in Leipzig has to work in a brothel for some of the authorized by the town leadership and police brothel owners, so that the bulk of the money from their absurdly high rents goes to the town rulers.

The law had another important consequence. It gave grounds to the German courts and institutions to consider all prostitutes as independent women whose testimonies are fully valid and acceptable. No sentence is issued unless the

accusations are not supported by the testimonies of the prostitutes. However, the reality is that the victims of the central organizations are completely dependent on them to the extent that any testimony against them is equal to suicide for them. No reasonable woman will provide evidences against an organization backed by the authorities of both her country and of the country in which she is exploited. Therefore I had no doubts that Lili would testify as Kottke wanted her and waited for her testimony to rebuff it with her SMS. The German court procedures preclude any opportunity that anyone from the big organizations is ever sentenced while it leaves the door open that other people can get either not justified sentences or too heavy sentences for their deeds if they are inconvenient for those who control the women. The German court procedures contradict directly the European Convention on Human Rights which almost 60 years ago, when technologies were almost primitive compared to those nowadays urged the states not to rely solely on the testimonies of the victims in view of their dependency.

However, the crucial contribution of the politicians to the human trade is in the tax area. For unknown grounds prostitutes in Germany, the majority of whom, including the sex slaves from Eastern Europe, are self-employed, are released from the standard for all other self-employed taxation and owe a daily lump sum tax of EUR 5, 10 or 15 depending on the province. The beneficiaries of this unjustified generosity are not the prostitutes, who particularly when dependent, are left at the end of the day without money anyway but those upon whom they depend and take away their money and most of all the politicians and those who promoted these politicians as the bulk of the released from taxes money goes to them. This conclusion is confirmed by the fact that discussion of the brothels taxation is a taboo in Germany and practically no authority bothers the brothel owners with taxes. Mr. Bayerl writes that even small brothels make at least EUR 100 000 monthly. It would be interesting against this circumstance to track what taxes the brothels in Germany actually pay. It has been said many times that a return to proper taxation in the sex industry, including the use of cash registers like in the shops will put an end to the exploitation of the women and hence to the human trade but this is the last thing the politicians want. They express concerns for the budget only when they cut the social welfare but the taxation of prostitution proves that these concerns are not real. By the current taxation a prostitute working 30 days a month will pay a EUR 300 if the lump sum is EUR 10. They are included in the flat rents, however it is up to the brothel owners to register the prostitutes and to make the payments or keep the money for themselves. In reality a prostitute in Germany earns between 6000 and 9 000 EUR monthly. No matter how inventive, she can barely avoid to pay at least EUR 1 500 for taxes at the ongoing tax brackets particularly if she is not obliged to pay rents to specific brothel owners. This makes EUR 1,200 more taxes to the budget. Based on the official statistics saying that about 500 000 women work as prostitutes in Germany, this makes EUR 600 million more taxes monthly or 7,2 EUR billion more taxes annually. I don’t need to discuss the stimulation effect of having many women with money and allowed to go out and shop for themselves on the internal demand in Germany and on the demand growth in their own countries because of this.

Instead what takes place today in Europe is an unseen in peacetime mass violence and cruelty against women for the purpose of their exploitation, which are hidden very efficiently by perpetrators and governments and remain unnoticed. The criminal and based on violence industry is growing quickly and criminalizes and corrupts the European political establishments and societies. It fills the pockets and bank account of decision-makers and politicians, finances political and election campaigns, predetermining their outcome and destroying the remnants of democracy and calling into question the legitimacy of governments who have come to power with money from brutal crimes.

For the East European countries this industry means quit and persistent genocide and continuation of the economic downturn as obviously the West expects from us sex slaves, for which purpose poverty and state protection of the organized crime are major prerequisites.

The system of modern sex slavery jeopardizes the very existence of our countries, nations and civilization.